| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs i5-3210M


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 147.9 k points while the i5-3210M gets 51.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 2.9 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
306a9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2019
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
24.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
51.73k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
3.08k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
8.58k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
3.76k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
3.99k (x0.51)
TOTAL
31.81k
19.42k (x0.61)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
5.79k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
18.77k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
8.74k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
4.59k (x1.05)
TOTAL
93.18k
37.89k (x0.41)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
8.59k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
8.88k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
3.59k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
3.45k (x0.4)
TOTAL
46.91k
24.51k (x0.52)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
20.18k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
19.96k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
8.93k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
4.6k (x1.07)
TOTAL
145.45k
53.67k (x0.37)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
9.11k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
8.88k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
3.46k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
3.45k (x0.39)
TOTAL
47.74k
24.9k (x0.52)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
18.72k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
21.09k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
8.38k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
3.54k (x0.86)
TOTAL
147.95k
51.73k (x0.35)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
1434 points/W
535 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2171 points/W
603 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
505 points/W
239 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
4227 points/W
1478 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
3676 points/GHz
2939 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5562 points/GHz
2863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/GHz
1117 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2378 points/GHz
1112 points/GHz
TOTAL
12902 points/GHz
8032 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4