| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs i5-1038NG7


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
706e5
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2019
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
23.2k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
21.2k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
9.4k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
11.54k (x1.34)
TOTAL
60.16k
65.35k (x1.09)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
94.68k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
103.38k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
35.79k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
9.33k (x2.2)
TOTAL
192.88k
243.18k (x1.26)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4