| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.1 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
706e5
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
3.88k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
14.98k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
9.7k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
8.6k (x1.1)
TOTAL
31.81k
37.15k (x1.17)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
14.61k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
54.9k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
27.58k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
5.04k (x1.16)
TOTAL
93.18k
102.13k (x1.1)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
12.89k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
18.55k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
9.93k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
9.54k (x1.11)
TOTAL
46.91k
50.91k (x1.09)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
50.06k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
66.1k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
20.24k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
5.51k (x1.29)
TOTAL
145.45k
141.91k (x0.98)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
13.58k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
19.53k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
9.37k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
9.23k (x1.05)
TOTAL
47.74k
51.7k (x1.08)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
56.25k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
73.73k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
29.56k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
5.39k (x1.31)
TOTAL
147.95k
164.94k (x1.11)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
21.5k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
17.71k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
7.92k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
8.24k (x0.96)
TOTAL
60.16k
55.37k (x0.92)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
73.03k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
68.19k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
24.89k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
5.54k (x1.31)
TOTAL
192.88k
171.65k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4