| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs i5-10210U


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
806ec
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
147.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
22.96k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
20.8k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.76k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
7.5k (x0.87)
TOTAL
60.16k
56.03k (x0.93)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
66.43k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
62.38k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
14.52k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
4.45k (x1.05)
TOTAL
192.88k
147.78k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
9852 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4