Core i3-9100T vs i3-10105
Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
253.93k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
4.5k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
18.39k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
5.78k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
8.3k (x1.07)
TOTAL
31.81k
36.97k (x1.16)
Multithread
i3-9100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
16.13k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
75.62k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
27.88k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
3.57k (x0.82)
TOTAL
93.18k
123.2k (x1.32)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
16.19k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
23.07k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
6.04k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
8.46k (x0.98)
TOTAL
46.91k
53.77k (x1.15)
Multithread
i3-9100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
57.59k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
100.63k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
28.59k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
3.56k (x0.83)
TOTAL
145.45k
190.38k (x1.31)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
16.11k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
24.12k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.71k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
7.89k (x0.9)
TOTAL
47.74k
53.83k (x1.13)
Multithread
i3-9100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
58.25k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
105.73k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
27.8k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
3.51k (x0.85)
TOTAL
147.95k
195.29k (x1.32)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
28.9k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
25.85k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.88k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
8.29k (x0.96)
TOTAL
60.16k
68.92k (x1.15)
Multithread
i3-9100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
111.69k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
110.23k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
28.45k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.56k (x0.84)
TOTAL
192.88k
253.93k (x1.32)
Performance/W
i3-9100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4