| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs i3-10100T


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.2 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
227.67k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
4.32k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
15.7k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
5.04k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
7.68k (x0.99)
TOTAL
31.81k
32.73k (x1.03)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
16.59k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
71.1k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
23.26k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
3.86k (x0.89)
TOTAL
93.18k
114.81k (x1.23)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
13.84k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
19.79k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
5.28k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
8.31k (x0.97)
TOTAL
46.91k
47.22k (x1.01)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
54.67k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
90.71k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
24.11k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
3.85k (x0.9)
TOTAL
145.45k
173.34k (x1.19)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
13.88k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
20.94k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.18k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
8.2k (x0.93)
TOTAL
47.74k
48.19k (x1.01)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
54.88k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
93.17k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
23.34k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
3.85k (x0.94)
TOTAL
147.95k
175.24k (x1.18)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
24.31k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
22.15k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.14k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
8.46k (x0.98)
TOTAL
60.16k
60.06k (x1)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
101.48k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
98.04k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
24.28k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.86k (x0.91)
TOTAL
192.88k
227.67k (x1.18)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4