Core i3-9100T vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.9 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.9 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
June 2019
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
14.87k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
21.53k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
8.39k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
8.21k (x0.95)
TOTAL
60.16k
53k (x0.88)
Multithread
i3-9100T
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
124.63k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
158.62k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
69.79k (x3.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
7.53k (x1.78)
TOTAL
192.88k
360.57k (x1.87)
Performance/W
i3-9100T
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4