| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.1 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
175.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
3.78k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
16.42k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
4.75k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
5.51k (x0.71)
TOTAL
31.81k
30.46k (x0.96)

Multithread

i3-9100T

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
15.18k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
74.87k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
27.85k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
6.08k (x1.4)
TOTAL
93.18k
123.97k (x1.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
13.72k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
22.93k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.99k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
5.27k (x0.61)
TOTAL
60.16k
46.91k (x0.78)

Multithread

i3-9100T

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
50.54k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
93.33k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
25.25k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
6.07k (x1.43)
TOTAL
192.88k
175.18k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4