| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.7 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
June 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
13.95k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
22.02k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.17k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
16.61k (x1.89)
TOTAL
47.74k
57.75k (x1.21)

Multithread

i3-9100T

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
120.59k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
197.34k (x2.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
56.83k (x3.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
6.41k (x1.56)
TOTAL
147.95k
381.16k (x2.58)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
12.65k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
20.95k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.63k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
14.47k (x1.68)
TOTAL
60.16k
52.69k (x0.88)

Multithread

i3-9100T

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
101.78k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
177.57k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
47.18k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
6.78k (x1.6)
TOTAL
192.88k
333.31k (x1.73)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4