| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
870f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
June 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
4.2k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
17.36k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
7.5k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
23.79k (x3.06)
TOTAL
31.81k
52.85k (x1.66)

Multithread

i3-9100T

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
22.11k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
108.04k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
56.81k (x3.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
36.39k (x8.36)
TOTAL
93.18k
223.36k (x2.4)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
15.38k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
21.94k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
7.97k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
24.76k (x2.87)
TOTAL
46.91k
70.05k (x1.49)

Multithread

i3-9100T

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
96.91k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
135.12k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
70.39k (x3.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
56.43k (x13.19)
TOTAL
145.45k
358.85k (x2.47)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
15.04k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
20.95k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
8.57k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
21.71k (x2.47)
TOTAL
47.74k
66.27k (x1.39)

Multithread

i3-9100T

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
94.36k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
141.73k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
69.38k (x3.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
32.72k (x7.94)
TOTAL
147.95k
338.19k (x2.29)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
16.04k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
24.47k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
8.38k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
21.66k (x2.51)
TOTAL
60.16k
70.55k (x1.17)

Multithread

i3-9100T

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
113.63k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
143.55k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
63.84k (x3.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
27.34k (x6.45)
TOTAL
192.88k
348.35k (x1.81)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4