| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs Ryzen 3 3350U


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.3 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2019
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
144.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
13.25k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
21.67k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.79k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
3.98k (x0.46)
TOTAL
60.16k
43.7k (x0.73)

Multithread

i3-9100T

3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
46.47k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
78.38k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
16.69k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.3k (x0.78)
TOTAL
192.88k
144.84k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
9656 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4