| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
210.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
4.26k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
19.54k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
10.95k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
11.08k (x1.42)
TOTAL
31.81k
45.84k (x1.44)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
15.69k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
68.3k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
33.66k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
12.16k (x2.79)
TOTAL
93.18k
129.81k (x1.39)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
14.48k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
24.18k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
11.95k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
11.01k (x1.28)
TOTAL
46.91k
61.62k (x1.31)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
50.98k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
80.7k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
36.61k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
12.02k (x2.81)
TOTAL
145.45k
180.32k (x1.24)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
16.27k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
25.74k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
11.5k (x2.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
10.82k (x1.23)
TOTAL
47.74k
64.32k (x1.35)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
54k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
88.76k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
35.23k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
12.14k (x2.95)
TOTAL
147.95k
190.12k (x1.29)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
22.97k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
21.61k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
8.99k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
8.52k (x0.99)
TOTAL
60.16k
62.1k (x1.03)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
82.75k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
86.58k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
29.34k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
11.72k (x2.76)
TOTAL
192.88k
210.4k (x1.09)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4