| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
3.75k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
17.22k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
9.79k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
8.21k (x1.06)
TOTAL
31.81k
38.97k (x1.22)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
9.19k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
35.47k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
19.14k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
5.82k (x1.34)
TOTAL
93.18k
69.62k (x0.75)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
12.9k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
21.4k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
10.73k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
8.16k (x0.95)
TOTAL
46.91k
53.19k (x1.13)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
30.31k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
45.13k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
20.17k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
5.77k (x1.35)
TOTAL
145.45k
101.38k (x0.7)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
14.65k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
21.57k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
9.93k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
8.02k (x0.91)
TOTAL
47.74k
54.18k (x1.13)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
32.14k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
43.54k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
19.58k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
5.61k (x1.36)
TOTAL
147.95k
100.87k (x0.68)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
24.25k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
21.63k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
9.09k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
7.23k (x0.84)
TOTAL
60.16k
62.19k (x1.03)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
56.9k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
55.68k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
19.29k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
6.09k (x1.44)
TOTAL
192.88k
137.96k (x0.72)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4