| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100 vs i7-10610U


Description
The i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 229.2 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
806ec
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2019
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
66.74k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
229.2k points
162k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.03k
23.1k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
24.5k
20k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
4.61k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.48k
8.94k (x1.05)
TOTAL
66.74k
56.65k (x0.85)

Multithread

i3-9100

i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
107.5k
73.36k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
95.11k
68.28k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
13.73k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.57k
6.62k (x1.45)
TOTAL
229.2k
162k (x0.71)

Performance/W
i3-9100
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1463 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
70 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
3526 points/W
6480 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
6675 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5833 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1365 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2018 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
15891 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4