| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100 vs i5-3340M


Description
The i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 164.8 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 2.6 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
306a9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
66.74k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
229.2k points
62.75k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
14.81k
11.51k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
11.13k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
4.4k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.8k
4.55k (x0.95)
TOTAL
47.17k
31.58k (x0.67)

Multithread

i3-9100

i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
52.08k
22.59k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
87.45k
25.49k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.98k
10.42k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
4.25k (x1)
TOTAL
164.75k
62.75k (x0.38)

Performance/W
i3-9100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
801 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1345 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
323 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
65 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
2535 points/W
1793 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5274 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1289 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1143 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
11232 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4