| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100 vs i5-10300H


Description
The i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 229.2 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
66.74k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
229.2k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.81k
15.65k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
23.13k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
5.66k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.8k
11.43k (x2.38)
TOTAL
47.17k
55.87k (x1.18)

Multithread

i3-9100

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
52.08k
26.77k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
87.45k
43.81k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.98k
10.17k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
11.91k (x2.81)
TOTAL
164.75k
92.66k (x0.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.03k
27.14k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
24.5k
24.75k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
5.73k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.48k
11.84k (x1.4)
TOTAL
66.74k
69.47k (x1.04)

Multithread

i3-9100

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
107.5k
105.77k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
95.11k
107.47k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
24.82k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.57k
8.02k (x1.75)
TOTAL
229.2k
246.07k (x1.07)

Performance/W
i3-9100
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1463 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
70 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
3526 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6675 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5833 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1365 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2018 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
15891 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4