| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100 vs Ryzen 5 4600H


Description
The i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 229.2 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.5 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
66.74k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
229.2k points
334.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.03k
15.48k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
24.5k
22.82k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
8.63k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.48k
7.17k (x0.85)
TOTAL
66.74k
54.11k (x0.81)

Multithread

i3-9100

4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
107.5k
117.98k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
95.11k
146.43k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
65.54k (x2.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.57k
4.77k (x1.04)
TOTAL
229.2k
334.72k (x1.46)

Performance/W
i3-9100
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1463 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
70 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
3526 points/W
7438 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6675 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5833 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1365 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2018 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
15891 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4