Core i3-9100 vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 229.2 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 1.1 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 229.2 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 1.1 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
66.74k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
229.2k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
28.03k
14.58k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
24.5k
23.98k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
5.35k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.48k
6.34k (x0.75)
TOTAL
66.74k
50.25k (x0.75)
Multithread
i3-9100
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
107.5k
57.37k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
95.11k
107.03k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
28.9k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.57k
7.05k (x1.54)
TOTAL
229.2k
200.34k (x0.87)
Performance/W
i3-9100
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1463 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
70 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
3526 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6675 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5833 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1365 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2018 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
15891 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4