| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100 vs i3-12100T


Description
The i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 229.2 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.4 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
90675
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
66.74k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
229.2k points
330.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
6.88k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
17.79k
17.36k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.58k
12.26k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
13.49k (x1.52)
TOTAL
36.53k
49.98k (x1.37)

Multithread

i3-9100

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.99k
22.03k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
66.31k
84.16k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.75k
46.49k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
8.96k (x2.02)
TOTAL
107.49k
161.65k (x1.5)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
22.39k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
22.21k
22.29k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
13.37k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
13.72k (x1.65)
TOTAL
51.84k
71.76k (x1.38)

Multithread

i3-9100

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
76.69k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
86.17k
104.06k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.4k
53.2k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.55k
8.86k (x1.95)
TOTAL
171.69k
242.81k (x1.41)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.81k
22.25k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
23.16k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
13.09k (x2.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.8k
13.21k (x2.75)
TOTAL
47.17k
71.7k (x1.52)

Multithread

i3-9100

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
52.08k
77.43k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
87.45k
109.08k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.98k
52.45k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
8.75k (x2.06)
TOTAL
164.75k
247.71k (x1.5)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
28.03k
43.24k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
24.5k
23.76k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
12.67k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.48k
13.88k (x1.64)
TOTAL
66.74k
93.54k (x1.4)

Multithread

i3-9100

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
107.5k
150.28k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
95.11k
126.29k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
45.32k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.57k
8.73k (x1.91)
TOTAL
229.2k
330.62k (x1.44)

Performance/W
i3-9100
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1463 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
70 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
3526 points/W
9446 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6675 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5833 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1365 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2018 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15891 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4