Core i3-8350K vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8350K is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8350K is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
91 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
October 2017
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.36k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.63k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8350K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
12.92k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
24.19k
10.97k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
2.54k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.13k
5.09k (x0.46)
TOTAL
68.36k
31.52k (x0.46)
Multithread
i3-8350K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
107.78k
103.33k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
95.93k
87.67k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.65k
20.1k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.26k
4.91k (x0.44)
TOTAL
237.63k
216.02k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i3-8350K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1184 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1054 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
2611 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8350K
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
6823 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6048 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1436 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2784 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
17091 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4