Core i3-8350K vs i5-10400F
Description
The i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.6 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.6 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
a0655
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
91 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16386 kB
Date
October 2017
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.36k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.63k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8350K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
28.39k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
24.19k
24.89k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
5.78k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.13k
13.19k (x1.18)
TOTAL
68.36k
72.25k (x1.06)
Multithread
i3-8350K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
107.78k
180.2k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
95.93k
163.51k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.65k
40.6k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.26k
6.48k (x0.58)
TOTAL
237.63k
390.78k (x1.64)
Performance/W
i3-8350K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1184 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1054 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
2611 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8350K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6823 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6048 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1436 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2784 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
17091 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4