| | | | | | |

Core i3-8350K vs i5-10200H


Description
The i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
91 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.36k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.63k points
260.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8350K
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
26.37k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
24.19k
23.91k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
5.57k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.13k
11.68k (x1.05)
TOTAL
68.36k
67.53k (x0.99)

Multithread

i3-8350K

i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
107.78k
114.08k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
95.93k
114.71k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.65k
27.33k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.26k
4.25k (x0.38)
TOTAL
237.63k
260.38k (x1.1)

Performance/W
i3-8350K
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1184 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1054 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
2611 points/W
7439 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8350K
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
6823 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6048 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1436 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2784 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
17091 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4