Core i3-8350K vs Ryzen 7 5800H
Description
The i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.8 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.8 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
91 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2017
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.36k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.63k points
426.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8350K
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
20.37k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
24.19k
22.52k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
10.18k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.13k
21.49k (x1.93)
TOTAL
68.36k
74.56k (x1.09)
Multithread
i3-8350K
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
107.78k
144.01k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
95.93k
191.86k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.65k
84.53k (x3.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.26k
6.5k (x0.58)
TOTAL
237.63k
426.9k (x1.8)
Performance/W
i3-8350K
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1184 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1054 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
2611 points/W
9487 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8350K
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6823 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6048 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1436 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2784 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
17091 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4