| | | | | | |

Core i3-8350K vs Ryzen 7 5700X


Description
The i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5700X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the 5700X gets 517.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X is 2.2 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
a20f12
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
91 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
October 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
68.36k points
85.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.63k points
517.51k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8350K
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
23.24k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
24.19k
25.25k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
11.66k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.13k
25.49k (x2.29)
TOTAL
68.36k
85.64k (x1.25)

Multithread

i3-8350K

5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
107.78k
174.56k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
95.93k
228.94k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.65k
102.32k (x4.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.26k
11.69k (x1.04)
TOTAL
237.63k
517.51k (x2.18)

Performance/W
i3-8350K
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1184 points/W
2685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1054 points/W
3522 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
1574 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
180 points/W
TOTAL
2611 points/W
7962 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8350K
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6823 points/GHz
5052 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6048 points/GHz
5490 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1436 points/GHz
2535 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2784 points/GHz
5540 points/GHz
TOTAL
17091 points/GHz
18617 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4