| | | | | | |

Core i3-8350K vs Ryzen 5 5600G


Description
The i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.5 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
91 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2017
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.36k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.63k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8350K
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
22.16k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
24.19k
24.46k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
10.71k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.13k
22.44k (x2.02)
TOTAL
68.36k
79.76k (x1.17)

Multithread

i3-8350K

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
107.78k
112.5k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
95.93k
153.92k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.65k
67.75k (x2.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.26k
11.47k (x1.02)
TOTAL
237.63k
345.64k (x1.45)

Performance/W
i3-8350K
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
1184 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1054 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
2611 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8350K
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
6823 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6048 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1436 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2784 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
17091 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4