| | | | | | |

Core i3-8350K vs i5-1135G7


Description
The i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8350K gets a score of 237.6 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 262.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
91 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.36k points
69.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.63k points
262.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8350K
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
26.46k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
24.19k
23.63k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
10.24k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.13k
9.05k (x0.81)
TOTAL
68.36k
69.38k (x1.01)

Multithread

i3-8350K

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
107.78k
105.02k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
95.93k
108.51k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.65k
36.5k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.26k
12.04k (x1.07)
TOTAL
237.63k
262.07k (x1.1)

Performance/W
i3-8350K
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1184 points/W
3751 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1054 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
1304 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
430 points/W
TOTAL
2611 points/W
9359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8350K
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6823 points/GHz
6299 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6048 points/GHz
5626 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1436 points/GHz
2439 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2784 points/GHz
2154 points/GHz
TOTAL
17091 points/GHz
16518 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4