Core i3-8145U vs i5-5200U
Description
The i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8145U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8145U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
306d4
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2018
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
34.48k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
75.13k points
68.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8145U
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.78k
13.58k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
12.14k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
3.18k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.3k
2.92k (x2.25)
TOTAL
34.48k
31.81k (x0.92)
Multithread
i3-8145U
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.06k
28.89k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
34.83k
28.74k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
7.31k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
3.74k (x1.46)
TOTAL
75.13k
68.69k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i3-8145U
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
1926 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2322 points/W
1916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
488 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
170 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
5008 points/W
4579 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8145U
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4558 points/GHz
5029 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3281 points/GHz
4497 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/GHz
1176 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
332 points/GHz
1080 points/GHz
TOTAL
8840 points/GHz
11782 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4