Core i3-8145U vs i5-10400T
Description
The i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.1 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8145U gets a score of 75.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.1 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
a0653
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
34.48k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
75.13k points
307.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8145U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.78k
22k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
19.98k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
4.57k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.3k
11.31k (x8.72)
TOTAL
34.48k
57.85k (x1.68)
Multithread
i3-8145U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
28.06k
136.69k (x4.87)
Test#2 (FP)
34.83k
135.25k (x3.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
32.76k (x3.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
2.48k (x0.97)
TOTAL
75.13k
307.18k (x4.09)
Performance/W
i3-8145U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2322 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
170 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
5008 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8145U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4558 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3281 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
332 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
8840 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4