| | | | | | |

Core i3-8130U vs Xeon E5-2680 v4


Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 13.2 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
406f1
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
14/28
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
35840 kB
Date
February 2018
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
1162.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
17.8k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
16.51k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
4.47k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.56k (x0.92)
TOTAL
47.35k
41.35k (x0.87)

Multithread

i3-8130U

E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
494.82k (x12.94)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
514.13k (x13.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
132.87k (x15.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
20.8k (x8.42)
TOTAL
88.35k
1162.63k (x13.16)

Performance/W
i3-8130U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
9689 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4