Core i3-8130U vs i7-9850H
Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 3.3 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 3.3 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
906ed
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2018
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
49.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
289.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
19.83k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
16.52k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
3.87k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
9.02k (x3.22)
TOTAL
47.35k
49.24k (x1.04)
Multithread
i3-8130U
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
130.19k (x3.41)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
121.44k (x3.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
28.05k (x3.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
9.62k (x3.89)
TOTAL
88.35k
289.3k (x3.27)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
2699 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
6429 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
4311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
841 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
1961 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
10703 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4