Core i3-8130U vs i5-4210U
Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.5 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.5 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
40651
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2018
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
57.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
13.79k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
7.79k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
3.11k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.72k (x0.97)
TOTAL
47.35k
27.41k (x0.58)
Multithread
i3-8130U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
28.78k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
18.99k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
7.21k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
2.6k (x1.05)
TOTAL
88.35k
57.58k (x0.65)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
1919 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
1266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
481 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
3839 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
5108 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
2884 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
1008 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4