Core i3-8130U vs i5-10400T
Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.5 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.5 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
307.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
22k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
19.98k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
4.57k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
11.31k (x4.04)
TOTAL
47.35k
57.85k (x1.22)
Multithread
i3-8130U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
136.69k (x3.58)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
135.25k (x3.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
32.76k (x3.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
2.48k (x1)
TOTAL
88.35k
307.18k (x3.48)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4