| | | | | | |

Core i3-8130U vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.9 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
706e5
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
171.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
21.5k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
17.71k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
7.92k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
8.24k (x2.94)
TOTAL
47.35k
55.37k (x1.17)

Multithread

i3-8130U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
73.03k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
68.19k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
24.89k (x2.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
5.54k (x2.24)
TOTAL
88.35k
171.65k (x1.94)

Performance/W
i3-8130U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4