| | | | | | |

Core i3-8130U vs Ryzen 9 5900X


Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 5900X gets 814.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900X is 9.2 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
a20f12
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
February 2018
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
83.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
814.74k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
22.6k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
24.85k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
11.25k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
24.8k (x8.86)
TOTAL
47.35k
83.5k (x1.76)

Multithread

i3-8130U

5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
258.21k (x6.75)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
342.24k (x8.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
155.3k (x17.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
59k (x23.88)
TOTAL
88.35k
814.74k (x9.22)

Performance/W
i3-8130U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
1479 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
562 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
7759 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
4709 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
5177 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
5167 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
17396 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4