Core i3-8130U vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.9 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.9 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
a50f00
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2018
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
21.2k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
25k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
11.44k (x2.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
24.22k (x8.65)
TOTAL
47.35k
81.87k (x1.73)
Multithread
i3-8130U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
145.13k (x3.8)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
198.36k (x5.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
85.67k (x9.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
5.79k (x2.35)
TOTAL
88.35k
434.96k (x4.92)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4