Core i3-8130U vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.1 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.1 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Dali
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
9.33k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
17.1k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
3.57k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
3.26k (x1.16)
TOTAL
47.35k
33.26k (x0.7)
Multithread
i3-8130U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
22.14k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
40.04k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
10.71k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
5k (x2.02)
TOTAL
88.35k
77.88k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4