Core i3-8130U vs A6 9220e
Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9220e is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 3 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 3 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
670f00
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA-FT4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
February 2018
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
22.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
29.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
7.84k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
10.54k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
2.27k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
1.7k (x0.61)
TOTAL
47.35k
22.34k (x0.47)
Multithread
i3-8130U
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
11.42k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
12.58k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
3.62k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
1.77k (x0.72)
TOTAL
88.35k
29.39k (x0.33)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
1903 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
2097 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
603 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
4898 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
3265 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
4390 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
9309 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4