| | | | | | |

Core i3-8130U vs Mobile 3020e


Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3020e is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.7 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
820f01
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Dali
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
29.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
52.42k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
9.28k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
14.56k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
3.44k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.06k (x0.74)
TOTAL
47.35k
29.34k (x0.62)

Multithread

i3-8130U

3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
15.75k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
28.63k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
5.87k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
2.17k (x0.88)
TOTAL
88.35k
52.42k (x0.59)

Performance/W
i3-8130U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
2625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
4771 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
979 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
8737 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
3570 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
792 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4