| | | | | | |

Core i3-8100 vs i9-10980XE


Description
The i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 200.4 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 6.2 times faster than the i3-8100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/4
18/36
TDP
65 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
25344 kB
Date
October 2017
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.18k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.4k points
1241.12k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-8100
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.72k
4.52k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
17.94k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
5.5k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.76k
9.64k (x1.43)
TOTAL
30.52k
37.6k (x1.23)

Multithread

i3-8100

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
84.93k (x5.87)
Test#2 (FP)
59.59k
409.55k (x6.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.07k
122.88k (x6.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
22.12k (x5.15)
TOTAL
96.43k
639.48k (x6.63)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-8100
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
16.03k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
23.95k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
6.03k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.87k
9.37k (x1.19)
TOTAL
45.81k
55.38k (x1.21)

Multithread

i3-8100

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
52.88k
316.11k (x5.98)
Test#2 (FP)
75.92k
503.75k (x6.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.52k
131.82k (x6.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
22.24k (x4.91)
TOTAL
152.86k
973.92k (x6.37)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-8100
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.52k
16.4k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
20.57k
20.97k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.96k
5.82k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.91k
8.86k (x1.12)
TOTAL
46.96k
52.05k (x1.11)

Multithread

i3-8100

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
53.4k
316.84k (x5.93)
Test#2 (FP)
80.87k
461.09k (x5.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.03k
129.82k (x6.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
22.09k (x5.15)
TOTAL
157.59k
929.85k (x5.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8100
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
24.47k
29.53k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
21.52k
22.59k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.95k
5.99k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
10.22k (x1.24)
TOTAL
59.18k
68.33k (x1.15)

Multithread

i3-8100

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
92.86k
587.06k (x6.32)
Test#2 (FP)
83.05k
496.41k (x5.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.55k
134.66k (x7.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.93k
22.99k (x3.87)
TOTAL
200.4k
1241.12k (x6.19)

Performance/W
i3-8100
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
1429 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1278 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
3083 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8100
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6797 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5977 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
16438 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4