| | | | | | |

Core i3-8100 vs i5-3570


Description
The i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-3570 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 157.6 k points while the i5-3570 gets 117.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3570 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
306a9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2017
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
59.18k points
35.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.4k points
117.91k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-8100
i5-3570
Test#1 (Integers)
13.52k
12.72k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
20.57k
12.18k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.96k
4.86k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.91k
5.25k (x0.66)
TOTAL
46.96k
35.01k (x0.75)

Multithread

i3-8100

i5-3570
Test#1 (Integers)
53.4k
48.14k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
80.87k
45.87k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.03k
18.16k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
5.75k (x1.34)
TOTAL
157.59k
117.91k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i3-8100
i5-3570
Test#1 (Integers)
822 points/W
625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1244 points/W
596 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
293 points/W
236 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
2425 points/W
1531 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8100
i5-3570
Test#1 (Integers)
3757 points/GHz
3347 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5714 points/GHz
3206 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1280 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2196 points/GHz
1381 points/GHz
TOTAL
13044 points/GHz
9213 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4