| | | | | | |

Core i3-8100 vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 200.4 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
706e5
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.18k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.4k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-8100
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.72k
4.05k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
15.29k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
9.04k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.76k
10.54k (x1.56)
TOTAL
30.52k
38.92k (x1.28)

Multithread

i3-8100

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
9.05k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
59.59k
33.88k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.07k
15.34k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
6.74k (x1.57)
TOTAL
96.43k
65.01k (x0.67)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-8100
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
7.07k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
10.55k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
5.27k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.87k
5.66k (x0.72)
TOTAL
45.81k
28.56k (x0.62)

Multithread

i3-8100

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
52.88k
25.28k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
75.92k
37.48k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.52k
17.77k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
6.92k (x1.53)
TOTAL
152.86k
87.45k (x0.57)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-8100
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.52k
13.9k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
20.57k
20.13k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.96k
9.41k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.91k
10.59k (x1.34)
TOTAL
46.96k
54.03k (x1.15)

Multithread

i3-8100

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
53.4k
55.4k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
80.87k
59.01k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.03k
22.83k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
6.7k (x1.56)
TOTAL
157.59k
143.94k (x0.91)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8100
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
24.47k
25.53k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
21.52k
19.99k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.95k
9.31k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
10.81k (x1.31)
TOTAL
59.18k
65.64k (x1.11)

Multithread

i3-8100

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
92.86k
58.46k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
83.05k
57.31k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.55k
20.1k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.93k
6.81k (x1.15)
TOTAL
200.4k
142.69k (x0.71)

Performance/W
i3-8100
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1429 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1278 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
3083 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-8100
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6797 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5977 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
16438 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4