Core i3-8100 vs i3-10105
Description
The i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 200.4 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-8100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 200.4 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-8100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
59.18k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.4k points
253.93k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-8100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.72k
4.5k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
15.33k
18.39k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
5.78k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.76k
8.3k (x1.23)
TOTAL
30.52k
36.97k (x1.21)
Multithread
i3-8100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
16.13k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
59.59k
75.62k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.07k
27.88k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
3.57k (x0.83)
TOTAL
96.43k
123.2k (x1.28)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-8100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
16.19k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
23.07k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
6.04k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.87k
8.46k (x1.08)
TOTAL
45.81k
53.77k (x1.17)
Multithread
i3-8100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
52.88k
57.59k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
75.92k
100.63k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.52k
28.59k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
3.56k (x0.78)
TOTAL
152.86k
190.38k (x1.25)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-8100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.52k
16.11k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
20.57k
24.12k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.96k
5.71k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.91k
7.89k (x1)
TOTAL
46.96k
53.83k (x1.15)
Multithread
i3-8100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
53.4k
58.25k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
80.87k
105.73k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.03k
27.8k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
3.51k (x0.82)
TOTAL
157.59k
195.29k (x1.24)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
24.47k
28.9k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
21.52k
25.85k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.95k
5.88k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
8.29k (x1.01)
TOTAL
59.18k
68.92k (x1.16)
Multithread
i3-8100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
92.86k
111.69k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
83.05k
110.23k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.55k
28.45k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.93k
3.56k (x0.6)
TOTAL
200.4k
253.93k (x1.27)
Performance/W
i3-8100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1429 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1278 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
3083 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6797 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5977 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16438 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4