Core i3-7130U vs i9-9880H
Description
The i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 90.9 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 4.2 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 90.9 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 4.2 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
906ed
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16386 kB
Date
June 2017
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
42k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.89k points
381.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7130U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.82k
27.81k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
16.18k
25.88k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.76k
5.65k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
14.19k (x3.35)
TOTAL
42k
73.53k (x1.75)
Multithread
i3-7130U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
40.25k
175.69k (x4.37)
Test#2 (FP)
37.4k
166.56k (x4.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.07k
35.04k (x3.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
4.23k (x1.02)
TOTAL
90.89k
381.53k (x4.2)
Performance/W
i3-7130U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
2683 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2493 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
605 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
278 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
6059 points/W
8478 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7130U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
6600 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5992 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1391 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1571 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
15554 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4