| | | | | | |

Core i3-7130U vs i5-5300U


Description
The i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-5300U is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 90.9 k points while the i5-5300U gets 76.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-5300U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306d4
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Broadwell-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2017
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
42k points
38.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.89k points
76.71k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7130U
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.82k
17.2k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
16.18k
14.53k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.76k
3.44k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.12k (x0.74)
TOTAL
42k
38.29k (x0.91)

Multithread

i3-7130U

i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
40.25k
28.7k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
37.4k
35.19k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.07k
9.24k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
3.57k (x0.86)
TOTAL
90.89k
76.71k (x0.84)

Performance/W
i3-7130U
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
2683 points/W
1914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2493 points/W
2346 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
605 points/W
616 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
278 points/W
238 points/W
TOTAL
6059 points/W
5114 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7130U
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6600 points/GHz
5931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5992 points/GHz
5011 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1391 points/GHz
1186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1571 points/GHz
1076 points/GHz
TOTAL
15554 points/GHz
13204 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4