| | | | | | |

Core i3-7130U vs i5-3340M


Description
The i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 68.1 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2017
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
42k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.89k points
62.75k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7130U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
9.99k
11.51k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
15.18k
11.13k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.67k
4.4k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
4.55k (x1.11)
TOTAL
32.94k
31.58k (x0.96)

Multithread

i3-7130U

i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
20.69k
22.59k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
34.96k
25.49k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
10.42k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
4.25k (x1.14)
TOTAL
68.13k
62.75k (x0.92)

Performance/W
i3-7130U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
1379 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2331 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
4542 points/W
1793 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7130U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3701 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5623 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1359 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1516 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
12200 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4