| | | | | | |

Core i3-7130U vs i5-10500T


Description
The i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 90.9 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 3.3 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
42k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.89k points
302.13k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7130U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.77k
3.87k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
11.25k
15.79k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.61k
5.1k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.22k
12.13k (x2.87)
TOTAL
21.84k
36.89k (x1.69)

Multithread

i3-7130U

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.42k
22.17k (x4.09)
Test#2 (FP)
25.28k
101.79k (x4.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.31k
34.13k (x4.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
3.74k (x1.04)
TOTAL
42.62k
161.83k (x3.8)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7130U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.94k
13.94k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
20.01k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
5.34k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
11.41k (x2.82)
TOTAL
32.11k
50.7k (x1.58)

Multithread

i3-7130U

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.39k
82.18k (x4.03)
Test#2 (FP)
32.49k
124.23k (x3.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.58k
35.6k (x4.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.63k
3.73k (x1.03)
TOTAL
65.09k
245.75k (x3.78)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7130U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.99k
14.01k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
15.18k
21.17k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.67k
5.21k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
11.42k (x2.79)
TOTAL
32.94k
51.82k (x1.57)

Multithread

i3-7130U

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.69k
82.38k (x3.98)
Test#2 (FP)
34.96k
115.64k (x3.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
32.22k (x3.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.71k (x0.99)
TOTAL
68.13k
233.94k (x3.43)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7130U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.82k
25.16k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
16.18k
22.28k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.76k
5.18k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
11.97k (x2.82)
TOTAL
42k
64.6k (x1.54)

Multithread

i3-7130U

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
40.25k
144.86k (x3.6)
Test#2 (FP)
37.4k
120.98k (x3.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.07k
32.55k (x3.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
3.73k (x0.9)
TOTAL
90.89k
302.13k (x3.32)

Performance/W
i3-7130U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2683 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2493 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
605 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
278 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
6059 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7130U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6600 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5992 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1391 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1571 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
15554 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4