Core i3-7130U vs Celeron N5095
Description
The i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 65.1 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 65.1 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
906c0
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2017
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
42k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.89k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7130U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
9.94k
10.08k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
10.11k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
4.06k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
2.36k (x0.58)
TOTAL
32.11k
26.6k (x0.83)
Multithread
i3-7130U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
20.39k
36.86k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
32.49k
38.51k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.58k
15.17k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.63k
2.72k (x0.75)
TOTAL
65.09k
93.26k (x1.43)
Performance/W
i3-7130U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
1359 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2166 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
572 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
4340 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7130U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
3681 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5317 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1398 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1497 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
11892 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4