Core i3-7130U vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 90.9 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 5.6 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7130U gets a score of 90.9 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 5.6 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
870f10
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
June 2017
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
42k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.89k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7130U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
17.82k
17.57k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
16.18k
27.38k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.76k
9.35k (x2.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
23.9k (x5.64)
TOTAL
42k
78.2k (x1.86)
Multithread
i3-7130U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
40.25k
176.08k (x4.37)
Test#2 (FP)
37.4k
219.88k (x5.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.07k
100k (x11.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
12.93k (x3.1)
TOTAL
90.89k
508.89k (x5.6)
Performance/W
i3-7130U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
2683 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2493 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
605 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
278 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
6059 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7130U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6600 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5992 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1391 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1571 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
15554 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4