Core i3-7100U vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 60.5 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.1 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 60.5 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.1 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
206d7
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
8 /16
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2016
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
8.76k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
13.49k
7.35k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
3.86k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
3.32k (x0.85)
TOTAL
29.36k
23.28k (x0.79)
Multithread
i3-7100U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
18.33k
78.51k (x4.28)
Test#2 (FP)
31.08k
66.46k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
36.42k (x4.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.61k
3.88k (x1.08)
TOTAL
60.52k
185.26k (x3.06)
Performance/W
i3-7100U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
1222 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2072 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
500 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
240 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
4035 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5622 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1624 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
12235 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4