| | | | | | |

Core i3-7100U vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 79.6 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 5.7 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306f2
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
August 2016
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7100U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2.41k
3.52k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
9.77k
8.68k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
2.83k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
3.13k (x0.88)
TOTAL
18.86k
18.17k (x0.96)

Multithread

i3-7100U

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
32.7k (x6.54)
Test#2 (FP)
21.48k
105.18k (x4.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.39k
35.18k (x4.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
9.54k (x3)
TOTAL
37.05k
182.59k (x4.93)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.66k
11.08k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
12.31k
9.57k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
3.18k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
3.28k (x0.84)
TOTAL
28.16k
27.11k (x0.96)

Multithread

i3-7100U

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.87k
139.07k (x7.78)
Test#2 (FP)
28.59k
133.47k (x4.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.68k
46.6k (x6.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
6.65k (x2.11)
TOTAL
57.28k
325.78k (x5.69)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
11.18k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
13.49k
10.06k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
3.21k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
3.12k (x0.8)
TOTAL
29.36k
27.57k (x0.94)

Multithread

i3-7100U

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
18.33k
140.98k (x7.69)
Test#2 (FP)
31.08k
145.37k (x4.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
45.62k (x6.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.61k
6.75k (x1.87)
TOTAL
60.52k
338.73k (x5.6)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
18.62k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
13.45k
10.49k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
4.04k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.26k (x0.96)
TOTAL
33.38k
36.41k (x1.09)

Multithread

i3-7100U

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
34.95k
236.25k (x6.76)
Test#2 (FP)
33.53k
151.05k (x4.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
58.9k (x7.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.38k
6.7k (x1.98)
TOTAL
79.6k
452.9k (x5.69)

Performance/W
i3-7100U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2330 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2235 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5307 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5606 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5606 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1415 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
13909 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4